The power of God
Drunk on rationalist positivism and atheistic materialist socialism the white man for a while believed that the weight of religion in human affairs was destined to be eternally vestigial.
Drunk on rationalist positivism and atheistic materialist socialism the white man for a while believed that the weight of religion in human affairs was destined to be eternally vestigial.
The problem of myth is not only and exclusively related to scientific thought, through the identification of the limits between it and the primitive one. It is related also and above all to the theory of the State.
I do not provide alternatives to technology. I do not do so because in my eyes there is no "inevitable necessity" to accept transhumanist and accelerationist demands in the terms in which they are pushed, as if they were here to do man a favor.
Nathan Greppi was interviewed by Radio Liberty to talk about the article "No research funding if the scientist doesn't swear by political correctness", where he illustrates how in Canada the inclusion of minorities is put before meritocracy.
Why have so few scientists come forward to criticize such an absurd strategy as the lockdown? The reason is that Fauci and Collins, sponsors of the lockdown, control much of the research funding.
Politics that abdicates, consciously or unconsciously, its functions in favor of technocracy, can only know the end of democracy as we have always known it. The scientific conception of politics is in fact at the antipodes of democracy.
Where, if not in a totalitarian regime, is science funding contingent on the researcher's adherence to the ideology in power? In "progressive" Canada, federal grants have begun to require statements of equity, diversity, and inclusion, which are evaluated before the project itself.
Epstein aveva rapporti con alcuni dei principali luminari della Scienza contemporanea. Tra le sue molte attività primeggiava, infatti, la passione per la Scienza, hobby a cui pare destinasse, ufficialmente, 20 milioni di dollari l’anno.
La Scienza non può dare pareri oggettivi perché, in quanto prodotto delle esistenze umane, non può che essere soggettiva. Pensare la Scienza come strumento e non come assoluto risulta dunque assolutamente prioritario in un'epoca in cui un nuovo oscurantismo si annuncia nel suo nome.